Logo

Nuclear Medicine Technology

Blue Bar

Nuclear Medicine Imaging and Function Studies
of the Gastrointestinal System

Gastric Emptying Half-Time (GET½) Determination


Review of Pathology Principle
Indications Procedure
Interpretation Artifacts
Other Modalities Case Studies
References Quiz

Review of Pathology

The stomach normally empties its contents into the duodenum within about two to six hours. A variety of pathologic conditions can alter the normal emptying rate of the stomach's contents. These disorders can be conveniently divided into two broad categories:

  • those that increase the rate of gastric emptying;
  • those that decrease the rate of gastric emptying.

Increased rates of gastric emptying (i.e.: a decreased GET½) occur with:

Ingestion of stimulants such as coffee or nicotine from smoking cigarettes prior to a gastric emptying study may increase the rate of emptying.

Most disorders and diseases encountered when performing GET½ studies result in impairment of gastric motility and a subsequent decrease in the rate of gastric emptying (i.e.: an increased GET½). These conditions include:


Return to Top of this Page
Return to
Top of Page

Principle

The determination of a gastric emptying half-time (GET½) is based upon monitoring the emptying of a radioactively labelled standard meal from a patient's stomach into the duodenum. After the patient ingests a standard meal, the activity remaining within a region of interest (ROI) placed over the stomach is monitored over a period of time (typically ~ 1 to 2 hours) and the time for the activity to decrease to one-half its original level is determined and reported.

Standard meals may have one of three general forms:

  • liquid;
  • semi-solid;
  • solid.

Normal gastric emptying rates vary significantly with the type and composition of the standard meal used. It is important that once the characteristics of the standard meal are defined and the protocol is established, they be adhered to.


Return to Top of this Page
Return to
Top of Page

Indications

A gastric emptying half-time determination is indicated in patients with gastric stasis disorders or dumping syndromes. The procedure will evaluate the rate of gastric emptying but is unable to identify a cause.

The test also has a role in evaluating patient response to prokinetic drug therapy or surgery.


Return to Top of this Page
Return to
Top of Page

Procedure

Patient Preparation

Gastric emptying half - time studies are best performed in the morning on patients who have been NPO for at least eight hours. The patients must not take any medications that are likely to alter gastric emptying rates. They must also be advised not to drink coffee or to smoke cigarettes prior to the test.

Patients must not have had an upper GI series within the last 72 hours.

Diabetic patients should take their normal morning insulin dose.

Pharmacological Interventions

No specific pharmacological interventional techniques are commonly used with this study.

Radiopharmaceuticals

Characteristics of an ideal radiopharmaceutical for incorporation into a standard meal for GET½ determination include:

  • must not alter the gastric emptying rate;
  • must not be absorbed across the gastrointestinal tract;
  • must not adhere to the stomach wall or to the other phase in a dual phase liquid/solid study;
  • must be stable in gastric juice;
  • must bind strongly to the standard meal and not separate out;
  • must mix evenly with the standard meal and remain intimately mixed during the emptying process;
  • must have a short T½ and good imaging characteristics;
  • must provide an acceptable radiation dose to the patient.

Because of their ability to satisfy these requirements, Tc-99m sulfur colloid and In-111 pentetate tend to be the radiopharmaceuticals of choice.

The standard meal used in a gastric emptying half-time determination has a significant influence on the GET½ value obtained and on the sensitivity of the procedure for aiding in the diagnosis of certain disorders. Factors influencing the rate of gastric emptying of a particular standard meal include:

  • volume - as volume increases, rate of emptying increases;
  • composition - carbohydrates empty more rapidly than proteins which empty more rapidly than fats;
  • physical state - liquids empty more rapidly than semi-solids which empty more rapidly than solids;
  • caloric content - as caloric content increases, rate of emptying tends to decrease;
  • nutrient content - as nutrient content increases, rate of emptying tends to decrease;
  • viscosity - as viscosity increases, rate of emptying tends to decrease;
  • acidity - as acidity increases, rate of emptying tends to decrease;
  • osmolality - as osmolality increases, rate of emptying tends to decrease.

Liquids empty very rapidly because they do not have to be broken down in size to pass through the pyloric sphincter. Nutrient and calorie free liquids, such as pure water, empty most rapidly and in a mono- exponential manner. As the nutrient and caloric content of the liquid increases, the rate of emptying decreases and the emptying pattern shifts proportionally toward a linear pattern.

Standard liquid meals that have been successfully used for GET½ determinations include:

  • Tc-99m sulfur colloid (10 to 50 MBq) in water and/or orange juice;
  • Tc-99m pentetate (10 to 50 MBq) in water and/or orange juice;
  • In-111 pentetate (3 to 5 MBq) in water and/or orange juice.

Because of the emptying kinetics of liquid meals, they tend to be much less sensitive than solids and their use offers little clinical information in most gastric emptying studies. They are not generally required for routine studies. The use of liquid meals by themselves, in the form of Tc-99m pentetate or sulfur colloid in water, is reserved only for patients who cannot tolerate solid meals. If a liquid meal is indicated, it is most commonly labelled with 3 to 5 MBq of In-111 pentetate and used in conjunction with Tc-99m labelled solid meals in a dual nuclide / dual phase GET½ determination.

Standard semi-solid meals labelled with 10 to 50 MBq of Tc-99m sulfur colloid that have been used for GET½ determinations include:

  • Tc-99m sulfur colloid labelled cornflakes (~20 to 25g) with milk (~150 mL) and sugar (~10g);
  • Tc-99m sulfur colloid labelled porridge;
  • Tc-99m sulfur colloid labelled pudding.

Standard semi-solid meals are currently used in some departments.

The best and most sensitive standard meals are solids labelled with 10 to 50 MBq of Tc-99m sulfur colloid. Among solids, foods rich in carbohydrates empty most rapidly while protein rich foods empty somewhat more slowly and meals containing significant amounts of fats empty most slowly. After an initial lag phase as the stomach contents move from the fundus to the antrum, solid meals tend to empty from the stomach is a relatively linear manner.

Solid standard meals labelled with 10 to 50 MBq of Tc-99m sulfur colloid that have been successfully used include:

  • Tc-99m sulfur colloid labelled chicken liver
    • in vivo labelled (the gold standard)
    • in vitro labelled;
  • Tc-99m sulfur colloid labelled liver paté in beef/chicken stew;
  • Tc-99m sulfur colloid labelled hamburger;
  • Tc-99m sulfur colloid labelled fried/scrambled eggs.

Some variation of Tc-99m sulfur colloid labelled fried/scrambled eggs (one or two large eggs), two slices of white bread (generally toasted), a "pat" of butter or margarine (one or the other consistently) and 150 to 200 mL of tap water or orange juice (to assist in swallowing the solid meal) is a very commonly used standard meal. The eggs are broken into a clean beaker (~400mL) and the sulfur colloid is injected into the whites (albumin) at several locations. After an incubation period of five minutes, the eggs are scrambled, poured into an electric frying pan, and cooked until firm. The eggs may be placed between the toasted, lightly buttered bread slices and served as a sandwich or they may be eaten separately along with the bread. The patient should ingest the standard meal as quickly as possible; ideally within 5 minutes.

The most important consideration is that once the composition and preparation of a standard meal is decided upon, it should not be randomly altered.

If a dual phase liquid-solid GET½ study is being performed, the liquid tracer (In-111 pentetate) is added to the tap water or orange juice.

Equipment

The equipment required will vary depending on weather just Tc-99m is being used or if In-111 is also being used in a dual nuclide, liquid/solid study.

Single Phase Solid Meal Study (Tc-99m)

A LFOV gamma camera equipped with a low energy, general purpose, parallel hole collimator and interfaced to a nuclear medicine computer is preferred. The camera's analyzer is set at 140 keV with a 15% to 20% window. The computer acquisition uses a 64 x 64 or 128 x 128 matrix.

Dual Phase Liquid/Solid Meal Study (In-111 and Tc-99m)

A LFOV gamma camera with selectable dual channel capabilities and equipped with a medium energy, parallel hole collimator and interfaced to a nuclear medicine computer is preferred. The camera's analyzers are set at 140 keV and 247 keV with 15% to 20% windows. The percentage of downscatter of In-111 into the Tc-99m window should be determined so the Tc-99m data can be corrected. The acquisitions at both energies use a 64 x 64 or 128 x 128 matrix.

Image / Data Acquisition Parameters

There are almost as many protocols for performing gastric emptying half-time determinations as there are nuclear medicine departments. As well as the possible variations in the standard meals, there are also many potential variations in the procedure itself.

Patient Positioning

Patient positioning is yet another factor that must be standardized in the gastric emptying protocol. Having the patient stand or sit in front of the gamma camera permits gravity to be a factor and more closely reflects physiological conditions. If the protocol calls for the patient to lie down, then gravity is less of a factor unless the patient is permitted or encouraged to walk about between images. Once again, the procedure must be standardized and adhered to.

The patient is initially positioned facing the gamma camera (upright or supine) with the stomach located towards the upper left of the field of view. If "cinescintigraphy" on a dual head camera is not being used and the patient will be moved between images, then markers (Tc-99m or Co-57) securely taped to the xiphoid process and the left iliac crest will assist in repositioning the patient for each view. The locations of the markers are noted on the p-scope with a water soluble pen. An alternative is to outline the location of the stomach activity on the p-scope using a water soluble pen during the first few images and to reposition within the outlines. Newer nuclear medicine image processing software contains re-registration capabilities to permit alignment of images.

After the standard meal is swallowed, it is initially located in the fundus of the stomach. Because the fundus is located more posteriorly than the antrum, as the digestion process begins and the food moves more anteriorly, the count rate for an anterior view may initially increase as the food moves closer to the collimator. Because of this, a study using only anterior views is prone to considerable error in the calculation of the GET½ value.

Several techniques have been advocated to correct for this phenomenon. The generally accepted method is to obtain both anterior and posterior images and to calculate the geometric mean. This technique is especially easy if a dual head camera system is being used because both images can be collected at the same time. For a single head camera, the patient or camera head must be moved to collect the two views. A second correction method is to image the patient using a left anterior oblique view. This method is not as satisfactory as the geometric mean method.

Single Phase Solid Meal Study (Tc-99m)

Once the patient has finished the standard meal, he is appropriately positioned for an anterior view. If using a single head gamma camera, a 1 or 2 minute image is taken after which the patient is quickly repositioned for a posterior view and a corresponding 1 or 2 minute image is collected. Obviously, when a dual head camera is being employed, both anterior and posterior images can be collected simultaneously. This first image pair is considered to be "time = 0 minutes" for the study. Imaging is repeated at 5 to 10 minute intervals for about the first 60 minutes after which the interval may be lengthened to 15 to 20 minutes. The study continues for up to 2 hours or until gastric emptying exceeds 50% (i.e.. less than 50% of the meal remains in the stomach). The increased frequency of imaging during the first hour assists in defining the length of the lag phase and provides more reliable data for calculating the GET½ value. A "cinescintigraphy" variation employs a dual head camera to simultaneously collect continuous 1 minute anterior and posterior images for the 2 hour duration of the study.

Dual Phase Liquid / Solid Meal Study (In-111 and Tc-99m)

The procedure for a dual phase study is very similar to that of the single phase study except with the modifications required to accommodate data acquisition in two energy windows -- 140 keV +/- 15/20% for Tc-99m and 247 keV +/- 15/20% for In-111. After the patient ingests the solid meal, initial 1 or 2 minute anterior and posterior images are acquired using the Tc-99m window and with either a single or dual head gamma camera as described above. This first image pair is taken to be "time = 0 minutes" for the solid phase portion of the study. The patient then quickly ingests the In-111 pentetate labelled liquid phase and a second pair (ant & post) of 1 or 2 minute images are acquired using the Tc-99m window. The increase in counts compared to the initial images permits calculation of the downscatter of In-111 into the Tc-99m window. The gamma camera's analyzer is then adjusted to the In-111 window and a third pair of 1 or 2 minute images are acquired. This pair of images is considered to be "time = 0 minutes for the liquid phase of the study. Imaging in the Tc-99m and In-111 windows is repeated at 5 to 10 minute intervals for about the first 60 minutes after which the intervals may be lengthened to 15 to 20 minutes. Because liquids empty so rapidly, frequent imaging during the first hour is recommended. The study continues for up to 2 hours or until gastric emptying of the solid meal exceeds 50%.

Data Analysis

Gastric Emptying Half-Times (GET½) are determined by developing a time - activity curve for gastric emptying and calculating the time required for half the activity to leave the stomach. After producing composite anterior and posterior images, regions of interest (ROIs) are drawn to encompass the stomach for each projection. Care must be taken to ensure that the region of interest passes through the pylorus and fairly snugly along the greater curvature of the stomach so as to exclude intestinal activity. If the patient was carefully re-positioned during each image acquisition, the same ROIs should function for all individual frames. Display the anterior and posterior images in cine / dynamic mode with their ROIs overlaid to determine if the ROIs are valid for all frames. If some images fall outside the ROIs, then either redraw the ROI, develop individual ROIs for those particular frames, or realign the individual frames back into the boundaries of the ROI.

The total counts within the ROIs for each anterior / posterior image pair are decay corrected and used to calculate a geometric mean count value. The geometric mean values are then plotted as a function of the time of acquisition. Alternatively, the geometric mean values can be normalized to the maximum value and the percentage of activity remaining in the stomach versus study time (minutes) is plotted. The times required for the stomach to empty half its contents (GET½ values) are then determined for both the liquid and solid phases.

An alternative quantitation method is to determine the percentage emptying at a particular time interval after ingestion of the standard meal (e.g.. 45 or 60 minutes) and compare the patient's result to normal emptying values for the same time.


Return to Top of this Page
Return to
Top of Page

Interpretation

As discussed above, a large number of technical factors can affect the rate of gastric emptying:

  • composition of the meal
    • caloric and nutrient content
    • amount and physical state
    • acidity, viscosity and osmolality
    • etc.,
  • positioning of patient during imaging
    • patient supine versus upright during the study
    • patient walks versus does not walk between images.

Because of the number of influencing factors, it is imperative that each nuclear medicine facility develop its own normal range of GET½ values based upon its own particular standard meal and imaging protocol. The protocol must be strictly adhered to in the performance of the study.

The literature suggests that there may be a sufficiently significant difference between the GET½ values for males and females to warrant the determination of separate normal ranges.

Emptying of Solid Standard Meals

Standard solid meals tend to empty in an approximately sigmoid pattern (figure 1). There is an initial lag phase as the solid meal moves from the fundus to the antrum and the process of digestion begins. This lag phase is normally about 5 to 20 minutes long. After the lag phase, the solid meal begins to empty from the stomach in an approximately linear fashion until almost all of it has emptied. A final slower phase represents emptying of the last remnants of the meal (figure 1).

As discussed above, it is necessary that each facility develop its own range of normal values based upon the particular standard meal and methodology employed. An approximate GET½ value for the commonly used egg sandwich meal is 60 to 100 minutes. When evaluating a gastric emptying study, the overall shape of the emptying curve should also be considered.

Emptying of Liquid Phase of Dual Phase Standard Meals

Liquids tend to empty in an approximately monoexponential pattern without a lag phase (figure 1). Normal GET½ values for In-111 pentetate in water / orange juice ingested at the end of an egg sandwich solid meal are approximately 10 to 20 minutes.

Emptying of Semi-Solid Standard Meals

Semi-solids tend to have very short lag phases and empty with GET values of about 30 to 40 minutes.


Return to Top of this Page
Return to
Top of Page

Common Technical Difficulties and Artifacts

Perhaps the most significant technical problem relating to gastric emptying studies is the lack of standardization of the procedure. Because so many factors can influence the results of a GET½ study, it cannot be emphasized enough that a department's meal and procedure be evaluated, standardized and adhered to.

Many standard meals have been evaluated in the literature. It is recommended that departments use one of the tested standard meals that have been determined to fulfill the requirements of an ideal standard meal. Non-adherence of the radioactive tag to the meal can result in falsely increased rates of gastric emptying.


Return to Top of this Page
Return to
Top of Page

Other Modalities for Determining the Same or Similar Information

Gastric Intubation

After intubation of the patient, a standard liquid meal of known volume, to which a nonabsorbable marker has been added, is instilled into the patients stomach. Gastric contents are sampled at various times post ingestion and the rate of gastric emptying is calculated by measuring the volume and concentration of the marker in the aspirate. The procedure is somewhat uncomfortable for the patient and the presence of the tubing may influence the rate of gastric emptying.

Radiographic Procedures

Radiographic monitoring of gastric emptying of a barium "meal" will provide a gross indication of whether or not the stomach is emptying its contents but the barium does not constitute a physiological meal and the technique is not readily amenable to quantitation. The patient also receives a relatively high radiation exposure.


Return to Top of this Page
Return to
Top of Page

Case Studies


Return to Top of this Page
Return to
Top of Page

Specific References

Pathology

Texts

Procedure

Texts

Journals

Videos

Internet URL's


Return to Top of this Page
Return to
Top of Page

Quiz


Return to Top of this Page
Return to
Top of Page
Return to Nuclear Medicine Gastrointestinal Home Page
Return to
Nuc Med G.I.
Home Page
Continue to Gastroesophageal Reflux Studies
Continue to
Next Study

©1998 - 2000 Lyle J. Goodin, BSc, MRT(N), ACNM
Originally developed August 19, 1998; Last revised April 16, 2000
Comments, suggestions or questions??? Please address them to Lyle Goodin at:

email lgoodin@idirect.com or
lgoodin@staff.michener.on.ca