21/11/97:
Inside the central sensorineuron aggregates, the memory eMs can be readily retained and even magnified through repeated induction. As one reactivates a memory trace, one's re-sensing it also intensifies its presence and self-awareness. For instance, although one reads a sentence only once, one can remember it much better through meditation, recalling that sentence in one's own head without repeated exposures to either the audio or visual image of that sentence itself. "Think it through time and again, and you'll remember it." That is because the memory traces of that sentence acquired on one initial single exposure to the audio or visual image of that sentence can and are reactivated inside the brain, causing their further electromagnetic interaction with neighboring and distant sensorineurons or even also motoneurons. In that interaction, these eMs by the process of electromagnetic induction leave their mirror copies in more and more neurons, thereby greatly amplifying their total strength and distribution in the brain.#FNT0 Functionally, one's memory of that rehearsed input becomes more vivid and more permanent.

There, what goes on at the brain's physical foundation naturally and logically is expected to and does give rise to, is consistent with, and is proven to be the genuine underlying neural processes by, a brain's functional manifestations.

Further proof comes from the well known brainwaves detectable from all living beings'(such as human's, ape's, ) scalp, attesting to the fact that a living brain is a biosphere with inexhaustible electromagnetic particles constantly being emitted also outward. This indicates the brain to be a generator of, and, in light of the fact that brain cells can retain or contain therein eMs, an effective capacitor for electromagnetic forces naturally including memory eMs.

The neurons are not electrical conductors such as the copper wires. Instead, they well retain electrons input into them. However, they are also good transmitters of impulses in an unique neuronal fashion(Fig. 7) which in itself demonstrates nerve impulse propagation not being the rapid conduction characteristic of electrical conductors which would not have been able to retain electrons or eMs as do the neurons, neural networks, and most effectively, well organized neural spheres such as brains and central ganglia. Because the neurons are not electrical conductors but similar to biocapacitors with neural processes able to input and output electrical impulses, eMs can obviously be transmitted into and be retained in them. Memory storage then can and does occur.

Functionally, unless sensation-giving eMs are preserved inside the brain neurons,we could not have any memory retention whatsoever. But since we do have memory and memory has been by methods and evidence other than a mere statement "eMs are preserved inside brain sensorineurons as memories" proven to be eMs, the ability to retain memory becomes a functional proof of the brain's physical and chemical capacity to retain eMs. Moreover, once telepathy is accepted as a scientific phenomenon(infra), the very fact that sending telepathy to others in no way diminishes but contrariwise usually strengthens the memory of those ideas telepathically sent out conclusively proves the brain's ability to retain memories and sending out their inducted copies as telepathic messages.

In 1974, at the Stanford Research Institute the mind could already be linked to a computer. The latter scanned and picked up the brain's electrical output to "read human thoughts." #FNT1 Recent progresses around the world have seen people successfully learning to use the electrical impulses given off by their brains to control computers, motors, lamps, channel surf on TV sets, and play video games without the use of hands or voice. Only a few well-placed electrodes [ on their scalp] and their will power sufficed to do the trick.#FNT2

In one experiment where the subject(T) used his brain electrical impulses to control a simulator, the signals from T's brain being measured were elicited by two soft white lights, one on each side of the simulator, pulsing in unison in a steady rhythm at the rate of 13.25 cycles per second(i.e., 13.25 hertz), a detectable fast flicker. T's visual cortical neurons, in response to this visual stimulation[by the flickering white light], gave off quick bursts of electricity with exactly the same frequency. Electrodes on T's scalp above the visual cortex[of the brain where central vision occurs] measured the strength or voltage in microvolts [of that precise rhythm] which varied according to the numbers of the neurons firing and whether they fired in synchrony.
T was able to control his response to the light: "by suppressing the rhythm in his visual cortex below a fixed threshold, he banked the simulator left;" by increasing it above a higher threshold(Fig. 8), he banked it right. When his response voltage fell between the two, the simulator remained stationary.
Continue

kccheng@idirect.com

Site Home

Cheng Review Home

Cheng Review I:1 Home

I:2 Home

I:3Home:

I:4 Home