May-Aug 2001


 Here are a few scenes from the last episode…

 

I have decided to abandon the Revflow (POSA) carburetor for the following reasons,

 

1)         Even when full throttle mixture is within specification "stock" needles seem to cause the engine to run lean in the 2700 - 3000 RPM range. CHTs climb rapidly in this RPM range suggesting detonation.

 

2)         When full throttle mixture is adjusted per instructions idle mixture is excessively rich. This has caused the engine to stall on a number of occasions (all on the ground so far) during acceleration.

 

3)         Friction on the slide requires higher operating force especially at low throttle settings. High temperatures increase this to uncomfortable levels.

 

4)         Mixture is sensitive to relatively small changes in fuel pressure. Vent position, fuel level in tank, atmospheric changes and flight maneuvering all affect engine performance significantly.

 

5)         The absence of an accelerator pump causes the engine to stumble slightly on rapid acceleration such as during a balked approach.

 

6)         From my reading it seems that most of the actively flying KRs have either changed away from the POSA or never used one in the first place.

 

After nearly 9 months of testing I simply have too many issues with its operation.


The Tillotson carb, after some initial success, also proved unsuited to my aircraft.

 

The biggest challenge proved to be getting enough fuel into the carb at high power settings and low tank levels. Even after drilling out the needle valve seat as large as possible the engine would still run lean at these settings. It was not possible to find a larger needle valve and seat even after a great deal of investigation.

 

Had I wished to install a fuel pump I believe this carb could have been been made to work, however this would have required considerable additional engineering. I would not have felt comfortable unless I had a mechanical pump with an electric back-up similar to the Cherokee.


I decided to try out the new Aero Carb form the Sonex folks. Since this is essentially a POSA on steroids I considered this an act of near-desperation. But the literature seemed to indicate that many of the concerns I had with the earlier Revflow had been addressed. 

The Sonex folks were pleasant, answered my questions and offered to refund my money (less the cost of the bell which is drilled out for each application). This seemed fair so I ordered the 32mm spigot mount version.

 

http://www.aeroconversions.com/

 

Installation was straightforward (it would have been very easy had I not modified the intake manifold for the Tillotson). One of the nice features of this carb is that the throttle and mixture cable ends are held in place on the body of the carb. No weird brackets to fabricate.

newcarb1.jpg

newcarb2.jpg

I again tested the fuel flow since the Aero Carb accepts a 1/8" NPT fitting (different from the Revflow).  I had also recently replaced a leaky fuel shut off.  Despite the fact that a 1/8" fitting is not standard for 3/8" fuel line (this really should be 1/4" NPT) I did find a 90deg fitting with a male 1/8" NPT on one end and a 37deg male flare end on the other. This allowed the use of 3/8" line/hose right to the carb fitting which yields a worst case fuel flow of 20 GPH! With the 1/4" hose fittings required by the Revflow the best I could get was around 15 GPH. In addition to the increased flow I feel the larger hose is less susceptible to vapour lock. With a low head pressure gravity system like the KR this makes me feel more secure.  The lion’s share of engine failures are fuel related in homebuilts and factory-builts alike. 

The carb required only one adjustment of the needle to run well.  Within 30 minutes the top-end EGT was set (150 degrees below peak) and the idle was smooth. Several tests were run with consistent EGT readings.  These first runs were done at about ˝ tank as recommended by Rex Taylor.  Further tests were run at low fuel (2 gal) and full tank levels.  Full power EGTs varied no more than  50 degrees.  CHTs stayed well within limits during these ground runs.  The idle was also consistent and smooth.

After about 10 hours of flight the engine consistently turns the following numbers:

                                                                       EGT  1100  (after leaning -150 below peak)

                                                                       CHT  380

                                                                       Oil Temp  190

                                                                       Oil Pressure 36PSI

                                                                       Fuel Cons 3.1 GPH

                                                                      Oil Cons < 1 QT in 10 hours

The plugs are clean and I have not seen CHTs in excess of 400 deg even during a 3000’ climb on a 95deg F day.

The only concern so far is a miss at idle after the engine reaches operating temperature.  This occurs at irregular intervals (between 5 and 20 seconds) but is not serious enough to stall the engine.  Additionally it does not occur at RPMs above 1400, or when the engine is cool.  I have increased the size of the blast tube to the magneto without effect. Additionally I have installed a baffle under the oil cooler to direct hot air away from the carb.  This seems to delay the onset of the problem somewhat however it has not completely cured it.


Back to Main Page